What do liberals consider to be a credible source for information?

Apparently you can't list Fox News, Newsmax, Drudge Report, or even Rasmussen as credible sources for information. So I was just curious where I can get information and FACTS that liberals would approve of?What do liberals consider to be a credible source for information?Anything that agrees with their thinking. I believed I knew it all when I was a young liberal, then I grew up and learned there is a more positive way to think. History proves over and over again the liberalism is a failed ideology.



MRWhat do liberals consider to be a credible source for information?
Anywhere that agrees with the lies they want to spill.What do liberals consider to be a credible source for information?Google, Wikipedia, CNN (the most laughable one out of the three)What do liberals consider to be a credible source for information?
CNNWhat do liberals consider to be a credible source for information?try the Huffington Post
You can't. Liberals don't accept facts, only opinion.What do liberals consider to be a credible source for information?
Anything pro-Obama.
MSNBCWhat do liberals consider to be a credible source for information?
Obama, Pulosi, Reid, Frank, Dodd...and of course Rahm.
AS long as you temper All those right leaning sites with left leaning sites, I see no harm.
Al Jazeera, world socialist website, anything not based in the US.
Ed Schultz and Thom Hartmann.
see, when you hear lies from Repugs for 8 years you kind of stop believing everything they say. You guys have no credibility left.
Most any source that is routinely proved wrong. THAT is the liberal "gold standard" for credibility.

Those who know who Paul Ehrlich is KNOW that's indisputably true..
The BBC, Associate Press or National Public Radio are usually pretty unbiased.

I only look at Fox "News" for a laugh.
Media matters, huffington post, new york times.
They have no qualms with the Communist Manifesto..:-)
As a Lib, I at least have the cajones to admit MSNBC is left-leaning.



Most Cons do NOT have the guts (or sense) to admit Fox "News" is equally right-leaning.



One primary difference between Libs and Cons, and probably the most disturbing, is that Cons actually can NOT see the "truth". That is the prime reason I left the Republican party last year.



I watch both Fox and MSNBC, NOT for truth, but entertainment when I need a laugh (or, of course, Rush :-)
Dan Rather.
Obama. Whatever he says must be true. Whatever he promises he will give them. Whatever he wants we must serve him. MM MM MM
I find NPR to be objective and interesting. the New York Times, though their opinion section is left-leaning, their reporting is usually top-notch. BBC news is also very good.
Any place that deals with REAL reporting, not rumor mongering. ALL of those deal with rumors and innuendos. They do not follow journalistic standards.
The truth is, Fox and Rush and their bunch are a credible source of information. You just need to go at them knowing you should believe the opposite of whatever they say.





buckeye
Credible newspapers like The New York %26amp; LA Times, Washington Post, Associated Press, Reuters, NPR, PBS, NBC, ABC, CBS, and BBC, are all credible sources of news. Gallup is an established and unbiased poll. Before you call those sources biased, remember ABC broke the Monica Lewinski story and all those I mentioned gave full coverage to that whole fiasco.
I get info from a wide variety of sources including some you've listed, a few "insiders" whom I trust and draw my own conclusions. BTW...IMO Rasmussen has become slighty slanted since last Novembers election.
CNN will be on the enemies list soon, one of their people grilled Obama's Chicago crony Valerie Jarrett about MSNBC being biased, and Jarrett didn't like that one bit.
So, I see that a credible source to you is a entertainment channel, Drudge which because of the NIXON, WATERGATE SCANDAL became popular and Something called newsmax is what you support your decisions on.



I told my children, which all graduated, magna *** laude how to come to a decision.



As far as I am concerned if that is all you do, you couldn't even begin to grasp the truth.
I can't speak for all liberals, but I read the Wall Street Journal, a variety of on-line versions of regional news papers, I listen to the News Hour with Jim Lehrer, I watch NBC, CBS, and sometimes ABC news (not all three on each issue, but one of the three each evening). I read local news, and sometimes follow links on the Yahoo front page. I also read USA Today, though not often. I listen to news programs like Washington Week in Review, BBC and Front-line on PBS, and when I'm driving I listen to NPR.



I do listen to Fox's Sunday morning programming, but I shout at the TV quite a bit when I do.



You can sometimes get information from C-Span, too.



For some of the more outrageous claims, you might try Snopes.com or factcheck.org.



I think most of those give you a good set of facts to work with.



I don't have cable, so I don't listen to CNN, MSNBC or FOX NEWS channels.



By the way, perhaps the problem isn't "facts" at all, but analysis. Facts are just facts. Some analysis is so slanted that it distorts the facts.



(Added as an edit - isn't it interesting that a lot of people who don't seem to be liberals claim to know what I do or don't read. If you ask a question about what liberals believe, I would think the more credible answers would be from actual liberals. I don't hold out hope that you seriously wanted to know where I get my facts, but just an amen chorus that you disagree with my interpretation of the facts available. I guess your choice of BA will confirm or refute that conclusion...some facts are hard to slant.)
Anything that isn't Fox. Fox news lies. Yes, give me thumbs down without reading the article. However, ignoring the elephant in the room (pun intended) doesn't make it go away.



Fox sued for the right to lie. When they've done so, why would you believe that they are credible?



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jane_Akre
Liberals wouldn't know credibility if credibility smacked them in the face...ask them and Michael Moore is "credible"...Bill Maher is "credible"...Rosie O'Donnell is "credible"...like I said libtards have no clue what credibility is....
Liberals don't approve of knowing facts.



Other than what you mentioned, this is where I find good stuff:



Wall Street Journal

Investor's Business Daily

World Magazine

Townhall.com